Search for: "Cheek v. Johnson " Results 1 - 20 of 38
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2024, 1:15 pm by Tom Smith
Johnson, which effectively ruled (in the tongue-in-cheek words of the Wall Street Journal) that there is a “constitutional right to vagrancy. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 2:55 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Jerome Cheeks, No. 111,279 (Wyandotte)K.S.A. 21-2512 appealPaul M. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 11:27 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Jerome Cheeks, No. 104,858 (Wyandotte)Appeal from denial of DNA testing (petition for review)Paul M. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
  “This session explores the 1902 landmark decision Roberson v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 4:13 am by steve cornforth blog
      Legal Cheek - https://www.legalcheek.com/Another blog which is still right up there 5 years on.It is an antidote to the perception that the law is dull! [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:10 pm by Adrian Lurssen
Ceglia v Facebook - Answer and Affirmative Defenses | Paul Ceglia v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 8:36 am by Aaron
Garcia-Salgado: The Court ruled that a cheek swab for DNA evidence is a search that intrudes into the body, and must be made pursuant to an order entered under CrR 4.7(b)(2)(vi). [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 9:12 am
Venner Via Recta v. 87   The one it maketh flaccide, and the other subiect to putrefaction. 1660   R. [read post]